Tuesday, April 28, 2020

A proactive response to a shifting construction landscape


A proactive response to a shifting construction landscape

As the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to expand, businesses are 
struggling to grasp what this will likely mean for their operations—especially their construction projects and capital expenditure programs. 

There will be delays, loss of efficiencies, and cost impacts, and there is little to no precedent to help companies understand the potential future impacts or when restrictions may end.

TZSTC stands ready to help untangle the problems and help you navigate the FCC regulatory issues that may result from delayed construction. 

Don't wait until its too late to extend your construction permit deadlines. Contact us today at 703-848-2130. 

Tuesday, April 21, 2020

FCC SEEKS SUPREME COURT REVIEW OF THIRD CIRCUIT DECISION OBSTRUCTING COMMISSION EFFORTS TO MODERNIZE MEDIA OWNERSHIP RULES

FCC SEEKS SUPREME COURT REVIEW OF
THIRD CIRCUIT DECISION OBSTRUCTING COMMISSION
EFFORTS TO MODERNIZE MEDIA OWNERSHIP RULES

WASHINGTON, April 17, 2020—Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai
released the following statement after the Solicitor General petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court
for a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the
Third Circuit in Prometheus Radio Project v. FCC:

“In November 2017, we adopted long-overdue reforms of our media ownership rules to allow
broadcasters to compete in today’s dynamic media marketplace. Our action was consistent
with Congress’s command that we repeal or modify any such rules that are no longer in the
public interest as a result of competition. It’s unfortunate that the same divided panel of the
Third Circuit yet again has blocked the Commission’s efforts to modernize our media
ownership rules—the latest obstruction of Commission action and congressional intent in
several cases over the last 17 years. As our filing notes, the court’s decisions have frozen in
place decades-old ownership restrictions that have outlived their competitive usefulness in the
digital age. Throughout our proceedings, the FCC has solicited extensive public input,
reviewed voluminous record materials, and adopted policies that the Commission determined
would strengthen local news outlets. Absent further action by the Supreme Court, broadcasters
will continue to be saddled with outdated regulations. The Supreme Court’s intervention is
necessary to restore the Commission’s discretion to regulate in the public interest and
modernize media ownership regulation for the digital age, as Congress intended.”


###

Monday, April 20, 2020

This week, the FCC will consider an Order that would modernize the Low Power FM Radio rules to provide more flexibility for licensees.

FCC FACT SHEET

Amendments of Parts 73 and 74 to Improve the LPFM Radio Service Technical Rules Report and Order – MB Docket Nos. 19-193, 17-105

Background: The Commission established the Low Power FM (LPFM) service in 2000 as a secondary, noncommercial broadcast radio service with a community focus.

The Commission designed the LPFM technical rules to be simple so that non-profit organizations with limited engineering expertise and small budgets could readily apply for, construct, and operate community-oriented stations serving highly localized areas.

In July 2019, the Commission adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to update the LPFM technical rules to reflect the maturity of the service.

These proposals reflected changes sought by LPFM advocates and licensees to improve their signals and provide more regulatory flexibility. The Report and Order would adopt most of the NPRM’s proposed rule changes, with small revisions.

The measures set forth in the Order would allow LPFM licensees to improve reception and increase flexibility in transmitter siting while maintaining interference protection and the core LPFM goals of diversity and localism.

What the Order Would Do:

• Expand the circumstances in which LPFM stations may use directional antennas and allow custom models designed for specific locations instead of only “off-the-shelf” models with parameters set by the manufacturer.

• Redefine LPFM station “minor changes,” which an LPFM licensee can apply for at any time without awaiting a filing window. The Order would revise the current definition from a change in transmitter location that does not exceed 5.6 kilometers to a change which either: (a) does not exceed 11.2 kilometers; or (b) involves overlapping 60 dBu contours of the station’s own existing and proposed facilities.

• Permit LPFM stations to own and operate FM booster stations, which amplify and rebroadcast a station’s signal, usually in areas with irregular terrain. • Make available to LPFM stations and other broadcast stations operating on the FM reserved band (Channels 201 to 220) waivers of the requirement to protect television stations operating on television channel 6 (TV6), which is adjacent to the FM reserved band. An FM radio applicant may request such a waiver if the TV6 station concurs or the applicant demonstrates that no interference would result. The Order would defer to a future proceeding the question of whether to sunset TV6 protections entirely after the July 13, 2021, completion of the transition of low-power television operations from analog to digital.

• Clarify that LPFM stations that go silent must, like other broadcast stations, notify the Commission if they are off-air for more than ten days and request Commission authority to remain off-air more than 30 days.

• Make non-substantive rule changes to conform provisions governing third-adjacent channel interference, correct repetitive language, and remove outdated information.

Monday, April 6, 2020

FCC AFFIRMS FIRST AMENDMENT BY DENYING PETITION SEEKING TO SUPPRESS COVERAGE OF WHITE HOUSE CORONAVIRUS TASK FORCE NEWS CONFERENCES

Media Contact: Tina Pelkey,  (202) 418-0536 
tina.pelkey@fcc.gov

For Immediate Release

FCC AFFIRMS FIRST AMENDMENT BY DENYING PETITION SEEKING TO SUPPRESS COVERAGE OF WHITE HOUSE CORONAVIRUS TASK FORCE NEWS CONFERENCES
Rejects Government Investigation into Broadcasters in Favor of a Free Press 


WASHINGTON, April 6, 2020—The Federal Communications Commission’s Office of General Counsel and Media Bureau today wholly rejected a petition by Free Press demanding a government investigation into broadcasters that have aired statements by the President of the United States during White House Coronavirus Task Force briefings and related commentary regarding the coronavirus pandemic by other on-air personalities.

The letter order, co-signed by General Counsel Thomas M. Johnson, Jr. and Media Bureau Chief Michelle Carey, notes that Free Press’ petition seeks remedies that would dangerously curtail the freedom of the press embodied in the First Amendment and misconstrues the Commission’s rules.

The decision also makes clear that the FCC will neither act as a roving arbiter of broadcasters’ editorial judgments nor discourage them from airing breaking news events involving government officials in the midst of the current global pandemic.

Following the denial of Free Press’ petition, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Pai issued the following statement: “Under my leadership, the FCC has always stood firmly in defense of Americans’ First Amendment freedoms, including freedom of the press. And so long as I am Chairman of this agency, we always will.

The federal government will not—and never should—investigate broadcasters for their editorial judgments simply because a special interest group is angry at the views being expressed on the air as well as those expressing them. In short, we will not censor the news. Instead, consistent with the First Amendment, we leave it to broadcasters to determine for themselves how to cover this national emergency, including live events involving our nation’s leaders.”                                                                        ###